La cote de rendement au collégial en question : une analyse des injustices interactionnelles, distributives et procédurales dans l’accès aux programmes universitaires contingentés au Québec

Stephane Moulin
, Marie Blain
, Flora Solé

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the injustices associated with the college performance score formula (R score), used as a selection tool for admission to competitive university programs in Québec. Theoretically, the analysis draws on the framework of organizational justice to distinguish three dimensions of justice perceptions: interactional, distributive, and procedural. Empirically, it relies on a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative analysis of administrative data with qualitative interview analysis. The findings identify three forms of injustice: an interactional injustice stemming from a lack of clarity, transparency, and communication; a distributive injustice linked to the violation of the meritocratic principle whereby individuals with the best results should obtain the highest R score; and a procedural injustice tied to the special treatment of atypical pathways, which contributes to distortions. The article concludes by outlining three avenues for reform of the current system of evaluation and university admissions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2026-03-17


Keywords

selection, R-score, Quebec, Justice, College



Section

Articles



License

Copyright (c) 2025 Stephane Moulin, Marie Blain, Flora Solé

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright in the article is vested with the Author under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Moulin, S., Blain, M., & Solé, F. (2026). La cote de rendement au collégial en question : une analyse des injustices interactionnelles, distributives et procédurales dans l’accès aux programmes universitaires contingentés au Québec. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 56(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v1i1.190897